|
NJ Lawmakers Move to Contral the Ravages of Managed
Care
New Jersey Friday, May 23, 1997
N.J. Senate approves HMO limits Firms would have to let patients
see any doctor. The Assembly will weigh in. Gov. Whitman backs
the
bill.
By Thomas Ginsberg INQUIRER TRENTON BUREAU TRENTON --
Managed health care firms in New Jersey would have to let patients
choose any doctor they want -- in or out of their plan -- under
sweeping new consumer and doctor protections approved unanimously
by the state Senate yesterday. The package of protections, if approved by the Assembly and signed
as expected by Gov. Whitman, would make New Jersey's managed-care
laws among the most stringent and comprehensive in the country,
according to Senators and consumer advocates. Drafted in reaction mostly to individual tales of abuse in the
burgeoning managed health-care system, the laws were passed amid
furious lobbying by consumer advocates, the medical community and
insurance companies. In just a few years, managed health care firms
have come to dominate health care and now provide coverage for approximately
60 percent of New Jersey's 8 million people, including almost all
of its Medicaid recipients. Among the measures approved yesterday is one that would require
managed health care firms to offer so-called point of service options
to their patients. It would allow patients the right to use out-of-network
physicians and still have their plans pay the costs. Exempted from the requirement is the so-called staff model of managed
care, which lets patients choose any doctor. The HIP Health Plan
of New Jersey is the only one that uses that model, according to
lawmakers. No other state has mandated the point of service option,
although some firms have been offering it voluntarily to entice
customers, according to Cathy Hurwit, deputy director of Citizen
Action, a Washington-based consumer advocacy group that is monitoring
managed-care regulations nationwide. ``We're having a race to the top,'' Hurwit said about the states
passing or considering laws on managed health care. ``New Jersey's
bill has some real victories for consumers. ''
Another provision prohibits managed care firms from offering physicians
financial incentives for withholding care or information about care
they deem medically necessary. It includes a ``Gag Clause'' to protect
physicians who talk to patients about treatments or recommend an
uncovered treatment. That's in response to complaints from doctors
who said they were fired or disciplined for suggesting expensive
care. The bill approved by the Senate establishes an independent appeal
process and creates a state-appointed appeal board for patients
who believe their managed care provider denied them treatment. It
also creates an independent appeal process for physicians who contend
they were fired without cause. The legislation would require insurers to use only physicians in
deciding whether to deny or reduce coverage. And it would require
full disclosure of coverage options and rules to patients. The bill permits the state to levy penalties anywhere from $250
to $10,000 per violation, depending on the infraction. Bills in
Connecticut and New York would impose similar restrictions, Hurwit
said. Texas has a bill pending that would let patients hold a managed
care firm liable for damages resulting from denied coverage, she
said. Many other states are drafting departmental regulations, rather
than laws, to address alleged abuses, she said. Pennsylvania has
begun considering regulations but its effort has not progressed
as far as New Jersey's, she said. ``Nobody's saying that we want to return to the old system,'' Hurwit
said. ``But that doesn't mean you should countenance a system that
provides incentives to deny treatment. ''
Managed care firms argued that imposing the point of service option
and the other rules, rather than letting companies offer them voluntarily
in response to consumer demand, will drive up health care costs
and ultimately hurt consumers. ``People certainly cannot think that you can mandatorily add on
procedures like the length of stay . . . and think that will not
raise costs,'' said Paul Langevin, president of the HMO Association,
which represents major managed-care firms in New Jersey. ``You're
going to see premium increases this year, unquestionably. ''
The sponsor of the bill, Sen. Jack Sinagra (R. , Middlesex), agreed
that health-care costs would go up within two or three years. But
he contended the rise would result from costlier treatments and
slower growth in the business, not from consumer protection legislation
like his. ``They've gotten about all the savings they can out of the system,''
Sinagra said. ``When they go looking for more savings, this bill
will keep them from getting it from patients. '' New Jersey lawmakers
last year led the nation in imposing minimum mandatory hospital
stays for child births and adopted a similar law on mastectomies
earlier this year, despite complaints from managed-care firms that
the rules were unnecessary and could add cost. Health care premiums nationwide, on average, changed very little
if at all from 1995 to 1996, according to Langevin and Gary Frazier,
a managed care analyst at Bear Stearns brokerage house in New York. But premiums next year are expected to rise 3 percent to 5 percent,
Frazier said. ``In isolation, these [ bills ] will not cause significant pain
to the industry. But collectively across the country, they do take
away control from managed care executives . . . and as a result
it has an impact in terms of medical loss ratios and profit margins,''
Frazier said. Sinagra said he hoped the new comprehensive legislation
would be the last, and dismissed what he called ``Disease of the
Week'' bills in New Jersey and elsewhere that only confuse consumers
and tangle up the industry. ``With this bill, we've done everything we need to do to manage
managed care,'' Sinagra said. ``I know it's politically correct
to bash HMO's. To say that all of them are abusing the patient is
not true. But unfortunately, it's true that some do not have the
patient's interest first,'' Sinagra said. Philadelphia Online -- The Philadelphia Inquirer, New Jersey --
Copyright Friday, May 23, 1997
|